00329nam a2200121 4500008004100000245003000041210002800071300001400099490000700113100002000120700001600140856005100156 1976 eng d00aBraconidae 9. Doryctinae.0 aBraconidae 9 Doryctinae a1263-14240 v131 aShenefelt, R.D.1 aMarsh, P.M. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/177001162nas a2200121 4500008004100000245007000041210006600111300001200177490000700189520077700196100001600973856005100989 1962 eng d00aNeue Braconiden-Parasiten von schadlichen Insekten (Hymenoptera).0 aNeue BraconidenParasiten von schadlichen Insekten Hymenoptera a297-3120 v493 a

One new genus and seven new species belonging to the Fam. Braconidae have been described. The new genus, Spathioplites nov. gen., is closely related with the Plathyspathius-group within the Subfam. Spathiinae. The new species Hecabalodes ruguloscolyti n. sp. (Iran), and Hecabalodes xylphagi n. sp. (French Equat. Africa) have been described. Descriptions of the following five species are given: Spathioplites phreneticus n. sp. (French Equat. Africa), Phanerotoma pyrodercis n. sp. (Senegal), Opius coffeae n. sp. (Congo), Apanteles epinotiae n. sp. (Austria), and Eubadizon ratzeburgi (Austria). Distinguishing features from the closely related species have also been enumerated.

1 aFischer, M. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/126902729nas a2200217 4500008004100000245013100041210006900172300001200241490000800253520202000261653002002281653002202301653002202323653001102345653002002356653001602376100002402392700002502416700001902441856005102460 2004 eng d00aPhylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence.0 aPhylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Dorycti a369-4040 v1423 a

The evolutionary relationships among most (143 genera) of the currently recognized genera of the braconid wasp subfamily Doryctinae were investigated using maximum parsimony analysis, employing 100 characters from external morphology and four additional, less well-studied character systems (male genitalia, ovipositor structure, venom apparatus and larval cephalic structure). We investigated the ‘performance’ of characters from external morphology and the other character systems and the effects of abundant missing entries by comparing the data decisiveness, retention and consistency indices of four different character partitions. The results indicate that the performances of the different partitions are not related to the proportions of missing entries, but instead are negatively correlated to their proportion of informative characters, suggesting that the morphological information in this group is subject to high levels of homoplasy. The external morphological partition is significantly incongruent with respect to a data set comprising the other character systems based on the ILD test. Analyses supported neither the monophyly of the large tribes Doryctini and Hecabolini, nor the monophyly of the Spathiini and Heterospilini. Relationships obtained from successive approximation weighting analysis for the complete data differ considerably from the currently accepted tribal and subtribal classifications. The only exceptions were the Ypsistocerini and the Ecphylini, whose recognized members were recovered in single clades. A close relationship between the Binaerini and Holcobraconini, and also Monarea, is consistently supported by venom apparatus and ovipositor structure characters but is not indicated by external morphological data. Low bootstrap values obtained for most of the recovered clades in all analyses do not allow us to propose a meaningful reclassification for the group at this time. A complete list of the recognized genera and their synonymies is given.

10aclassification10aconsistency index10adata decisiveness10ainsect10aretention index10asystematics1 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aZaldivar-Riveron, A.1 aQuicke, D.L.J. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/1025