01178nas a2200229 4500008004100000245014800041210006900189300001200258490000700270520044100277653002400718653001500742653001600757653001500773653001600788653001700804653002000821653001600841653001600857100002400873856005100897 2015 eng d00aTwo new species of the genera Caenophanes Foerster, 1862 and Neurocrassus Šnoflak, 1945 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Afrotropical Region0 aTwo new species of the genera Caenophanes Foerster 1862 and Neur a169-1720 v113 a

Two new species of the genera Caenophanes Foerster, 1862, Caenophanes (Caenophanes) dlusskyi sp. n., and Neurocrassus Šnoflak, 1945, N. africanus sp. n., from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Republic of Côte d’Ivoire are described and illustrated. The new combination Neurocrassus transversalis (Szépligeti, 1914), comb. n. is given.

10aAfrotropical Region10aBraconidae10aCaenophanes10aDoryctinae10aHymenoptera10aNeurocrassus10anew combination10anew species10aparasitoids1 aBelokobylskij, S.A. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/189500900nas a2200205 4500008004100000245013900041210006900180260001200249300001000261490000700271520025400278653001500532653001600547653001500563653001500578653002100593653001300614100001600627856005100643 2014 eng d00aFirst record from Costa Rica of the genus Caenophanes Foerster and description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Doryctinae)0 aFirst record from Costa Rica of the genus Caenophanes Foerster a c06/2014 a11-170 v383 a

The genus Caenophanes Foerster is distinguished from the genus Heterospilus Haliday and one new species is described from Costa Rica which is the first species of Caenophanes described from the Western Hemisphere

10aBraconidae10aCaenophanes10aCosta Rica10aDoryctinae10aParasitoid wasps10ataxonomy1 aMarsh, P.M. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/182600348nas a2200109 4500008004100000245005600041210005500097300001200152490000700164100001600171856005100187 1862 eng d00aSynopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Braconiden.0 aSynopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Braconiden a225-2880 v191 aForster, A. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/130300479nas a2200109 4500008004100000245016400041210006900205300001000274490001000284100002400294856005100318 2010 eng d00aA new subgenus and three new species of the genus Caenophanes Foerster, 1862 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Doryctinae) from the New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea.0 anew subgenus and three new species of the genus Caenophanes Foer a77-870 v60(1)1 aBelokobylskij, S.A. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/101800485nas a2200133 4500008004100000245011900041210006900160300001000229490000600239100002400245700001400269700001700283856005100300 2004 eng d00aSystematics, distribution and diversity of the Australasian doryctine wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Doryctinae).0 aSystematics distribution and diversity of the Australasian doryc a1-1500 v81 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aIqbal, M.1 aAustin, A.D. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/102102729nas a2200217 4500008004100000245013100041210006900172300001200241490000800253520202000261653002002281653002202301653002202323653001102345653002002356653001602376100002402392700002502416700001902441856005102460 2004 eng d00aPhylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) based on morphological evidence.0 aPhylogeny of the genera of the parasitic wasps subfamily Dorycti a369-4040 v1423 a

The evolutionary relationships among most (143 genera) of the currently recognized genera of the braconid wasp subfamily Doryctinae were investigated using maximum parsimony analysis, employing 100 characters from external morphology and four additional, less well-studied character systems (male genitalia, ovipositor structure, venom apparatus and larval cephalic structure). We investigated the ‘performance’ of characters from external morphology and the other character systems and the effects of abundant missing entries by comparing the data decisiveness, retention and consistency indices of four different character partitions. The results indicate that the performances of the different partitions are not related to the proportions of missing entries, but instead are negatively correlated to their proportion of informative characters, suggesting that the morphological information in this group is subject to high levels of homoplasy. The external morphological partition is significantly incongruent with respect to a data set comprising the other character systems based on the ILD test. Analyses supported neither the monophyly of the large tribes Doryctini and Hecabolini, nor the monophyly of the Spathiini and Heterospilini. Relationships obtained from successive approximation weighting analysis for the complete data differ considerably from the currently accepted tribal and subtribal classifications. The only exceptions were the Ypsistocerini and the Ecphylini, whose recognized members were recovered in single clades. A close relationship between the Binaerini and Holcobraconini, and also Monarea, is consistently supported by venom apparatus and ovipositor structure characters but is not indicated by external morphological data. Low bootstrap values obtained for most of the recovered clades in all analyses do not allow us to propose a meaningful reclassification for the group at this time. A complete list of the recognized genera and their synonymies is given.

10aclassification10aconsistency index10adata decisiveness10ainsect10aretention index10asystematics1 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aZaldivar-Riveron, A.1 aQuicke, D.L.J. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/102503265nas a2200133 4500008004100000245009600041210006900137300001200206490001000218520281400228100002403042700001403066856005103080 2006 eng d00aReview of the genera from the subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) new for Japan.0 aReview of the genera from the subfamily Doryctinae Hymenoptera B a675-7520 v56(4)3 a

Ten genera of the subfamily Doryctinae are recorded from Japan for the first time: Caenophanes Foerster, 1862, Guaygata Marsh, 1993, Leluthia Cameron, 1887, Mimipodoryctes Belokobylskij, 2001, Neurocrassus Šnoflak, 1945, Parallorhogas Marsh, 1993, Platyspathius Viereck, 1911, Polystenus Foerster, 1862, Rhacontsira Belokobylskij, 1998, and Spathiomorpha Tobias, 1976. Twenty five new species and one new subspecies are described from the Japanese islands: Caenophanes confusus sp. nov., C. infuscatus sp. nov., C. kyushuensis sp. nov., C. pumilio sp. nov., C. rasilis sp. nov., C. yakuensis sp. nov., Guaygata mayaensis sp. nov., Leluthia (Leluthia) honshuensis sp. nov., L. (L.) nagoyae sp. nov., L. (Euhecabolodes) postfurcalis sp. nov., Mimipodoryctes rokkoensis sp. nov., Neurocrassus hinoematus sp. nov., N. hypodoryctoides sp. nov. N. ibarakius sp. nov., N. miyanourus sp. nov., N. sanageensis sp. nov., Parallorhogas ambiguus sp. nov., P. boninus sp. nov., P. icarus sp. nov., P. maeseensis sp. nov., P. pacificus sp. nov., P. pacificus micronesianus subsp. nov., Rhacontsira insulicola sp. nov., R. toyota sp. nov., R. yamagishii sp. nov., Spathiomorpha japonica sp. nov. Six species are recorded for the first time for Japan: Guaygata mariae (Belokobylskij, 1993), Neurocrassus rarus (Belokobylskij, 1982), N. tentorialis Belokobylskij, 1993, Platyspathius ornatulus (Enderlein, 1912), Polystenus rugosus Foerster, 1862, Rhacontsira heterospiloides (Belokobylskij, 1988). Two new synonyms are suggested: Rhyssalus rubriceps Cameron, 1909 = Mimipodoryctes robustus Belokobylskij, 2001 (syn. nov.); Spathiohormius ornatulus Enderlein, 1912 = Spathius dinoderi Gahan, 1925 (syn. nov.). The following new combinations are given: Guaygata mariae (Belokobylskij, 1993), comb. nov., Polystenus remus (Nixon, 1943), comb. nov., Spathiostenus tenuis (Nixon, 1943), comb. nov. Lectotypes of Spathiohormius ornatulus Enderlein and Rhyssalus rubriceps Cameron are designated for stability of nomenclature. Keys to species of the genera Caenophanes Foerster, Guaygata Marsh, Leluthia Cameron, Mimipodoryctes Belokobylskij, Neurocrassus Šnoflak, Parallorhogas Marsh, Rhacontsira Belokobylskij, and Spathiomorpha Tobias are provided.

1 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aMaeto, K. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/101000473nas a2200109 4500008004100000245016000041210006900201300001200270490000700282100002400289856005000313 1992 eng d00a[On the classification and phylogeny of the braconid wasps subfamilies Doryctinae and Exothecinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) Part 1. On the classification.]0 aclassification and phylogeny of the braconid wasps subfamilies D a900-9270 v711 aBelokobylskij, S.A. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/97401313nas a2200121 4500008004100000245015000041210006900191300001000260490001200270520083500282100002401117856005001141 1993 eng d00aNotes on the taxonomy of the Doryctinae with description of a new genus and three new species from the Oriental region (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).0 aNotes on the taxonomy of the Doryctinae with description of a ne a89-960 v1(1992)3 a

The taxonomy of some Old World Doryctinae is discussed. New taxa: Hemidoryctes (gen.n.) soror sp.n. (Java), Caenophanes luculentus sp.n., Dendrosotinus gratus sp.n. (both from Vietnam). New synonymies: Dendrosotinus Telenga, 1941 = Gildoria Hedqvist, 1974; Pseudorhoptrocentrus niger (Szepligeti, 1914), comb.n. (from Neodoryctes) = P. brunneus Granger, 1949; Caenophanes incompletus (Ratzeburg, 1844) = Heterospilus rugosifrons Picard, 1939. Dendrosotinus Telenga, 1941 is considered as a good genus distinct from Caenophanes Förster, 1862. Lectotypes of Pseudorhoptrocentrus brunneus Granger, 1949 and Heterospilus rugosifrons Picard, 1939 are designated.

1 aBelokobylskij, S.A. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/97800366nas a2200121 4500008004100000245002700041210002300068300001000091490005200101100002400153700001700177856005000194 1986 eng d00aDoryctinae. pp. 21-72.0 aDoryctinae pp 2172 a1-5010 v3, Peredpontdatokrylye 4. Opr. Faune ssSR.' 1451 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aTobias, V.I. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/96200999nas a2200157 4500008004100000022001400041245010600055210006900161300001200230490000700242520048000249100002400729700001600753700002300769856004900792 2011 eng d a0003-454100aThe genus Caenophanes Foerster, 1862 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Doryctinae) in the Western Palaeractic0 agenus Caenophanes Foerster 1862 Hymenoptera Braconidae Doryctina a773-7870 v613 a

The Western Palaearctic species of the genus Caenophanes Foerster are reviewed. A new species from the Canary Islands, C. lapalmaensis sp. nov., is described. The name C. rugosifrons (Picard) is restored from synonymy (stat. resurr.). The redescriptions of C. incompletus (Ratzeburg) and C. rugosifrons are given. A key to the Western Palaearctic species of Caenophanes is suggested.

1 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aFalco, J.V.1 aJimenez-Peydro, R. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/6101912nas a2200193 4500008004100000245013300041210006900174300001200243490000700255520128200262653000801544653000801552100002501560700002401585700002201609700001901631700001901650856004901669 2008 eng d00aMolecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the cosmopolitan parasitic wasp subfamily Doryctinae (Hymenoptera:Braconidae)0 aMolecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the cosmopoli a345-3630 v223 a

The phylogenetic relationships among representatives of 64 genera of the cosmopolitan parasitic wasps of the subfamily Doryctinae were investigated based on nuclear 28S ribosomal (r) DNA (~650 bp of the D2–3 region) and cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) mitochondrial (mt) DNA (603 bp) sequence data. The molecular dating of selected clades and the biogeography of the subfamily were also inferred. The partitioned Bayesian analyses did not recover a monophyletic Doryctinae, though the relationships involved were only weakly supported. Strong evidence was found for rejecting the monophylies of both Doryctes Haliday, 1836 and Spathius Nees, 1818. Our results also support the recognition of the Rhaconotini as a valid tribe. A dispersal–vicariance analysis showed a strong geographical signal for the taxa included, with molecular dating estimates for the origin of Doryctinae and its subsequent radiation both occurring during the late Paleocene–early Eocene. The divergence time estimates suggest that diversification in the subfamily could have in part occurred as a result of continental break-up events that took place in the southern hemisphere, though more recent dispersal events account for the current distribution of several widespread taxa.

10a28S10aCOI1 aZaldivar-Riveron, A.1 aBelokobylskij, S.A.1 aLeon-Regagnon, V.1 aBriceño, R.G.1 aQuicke, D.L.J. uhttps://doryctinaekey.myspecies.info/node/43